Sanctions imposed against Russia must remain consistent and cannot be weakened due to individual agreements. The EU must understand its responsibility and adhere to the rules of sanction mechanisms. This opinion was expressed by the chief consultant of the Center for Foreign Policy Studies at the National Institute for Economic Research, Ivan Us, commenting to the Oboz.ua portal on the decision of the PACE to impose additional sanctions against Russia.
The decision of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) to impose additional sanctions against Russia has caused a lot of discussion and debate. While some argue that these sanctions are necessary to hold Russia accountable for its actions, others believe that they will only further escalate tensions and hinder any potential progress in resolving conflicts.
In this context, Ivan Us, a leading expert on foreign policy, has expressed his opinion that the sanctions imposed against Russia must remain consistent and cannot be weakened due to individual agreements. He believes that the EU must understand its responsibility and adhere to the rules of sanction mechanisms.
Us argues that the EU must not give in to pressure from individual member states or external actors to weaken or lift sanctions against Russia. He emphasizes that the sanctions were imposed as a response to Russia’s actions, and any deviation from this stance would undermine the credibility of the EU and its commitment to upholding international norms and values.
Furthermore, Us stresses the importance of consistency in the application of sanctions. He argues that any wavering or inconsistency in the enforcement of sanctions would only weaken their effectiveness and send a message of weakness to Russia. This, in turn, could embolden Russia to continue its aggressive actions and disregard international laws and norms.
Us also highlights the responsibility of the EU in ensuring that the sanctions are effective. He believes that the EU must closely monitor and evaluate the impact of the sanctions and make necessary adjustments to ensure their effectiveness. This includes identifying and targeting key sectors of the Russian economy that are most vulnerable to sanctions and continuously updating the list of individuals and entities subject to sanctions.
Moreover, Us emphasizes the need for the EU to work closely with its international partners, particularly the United States, in enforcing sanctions against Russia. He argues that a united front is crucial in sending a strong message to Russia and deterring any further aggressive actions.
In conclusion, Ivan Us’s opinion on the need for consistency and strict adherence to sanction mechanisms is a timely reminder for the EU to stay true to its principles and responsibilities. The decision of the PACE to impose additional sanctions against Russia is a step in the right direction, and it is crucial for the EU to remain steadfast in its stance and not give in to any pressure to weaken or lift sanctions. Only through a united and consistent approach can the EU effectively hold Russia accountable for its actions and promote peace and stability in the region.